Audi Q3 Review (2011-2017)

4.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Typical high-quality Audi interior

  • Good-looking exterior design

  • Agile handling and a comfortable ride

Cons

  • Cramped rear seats and small boot

  • Scary thirst if you choose the high-performance RS

  • Not as reliable as it could be

4/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2011-2017 Audi Q3 Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

If you’re looking for style, image and prestige, but you don’t need your car to be the last word in practicality, then the Audi Q3 is a very sound choice. Its SUV styling means it’s about as fashionable as cars come, and its desirable Audi badge means it has a premium clout that the Fords and the Toyotas of the world simply can’t match. And, being an Audi, it also delivers class-leading cabin quality, in terms of both its materials and assembly, making it feel as substantial as it does luxurious. The driving experience, meanwhile, is just as civilised, with an impressive mix of comfort, agility, refinement and economy.

Yes, the cramped rear seats and small boot means it won’t suit families, even quite small ones, but if it’s just you and the odd pal, it’ll be fine. It’s not the most affordable small SUV, either, but importantly, it does feel worth the cash you pay.

Search for an Audi Q3 on CarGurus

What is the Audi Q3?

When it comes to desirability, the Audi Q3 is about as desirable as it gets. No type of car is more sought-after than the SUV right now, a box that the Q3 obviously has checked, and having a prestige badge on the nose does want levels no harm whatsoever, either. As the smallest of Audi’s lineup of Q-badged SUVs, it’s also the most affordable, meaning this desirability is also more attainable. What’s not to like?

Of course, desirability is no guarantee of excellence, but happily the first-generation Q3 – sold between 2011 and 2017 – also happens to be a very good car in several other ways.

  • When the Q3 was first launched, just four engines were offered, two petrol and two diesel, all turbocharged 2.0-litre units. The diesels had 140hp or 177hp, with the former having front-wheel drive and the latter – like all other Q3s – having four-wheel drive, which Audi calls quattro. The petrols, meanwhile, came with either 170hp or 211hp. All could be had with a six-speed manual gearbox or a seven-speed S-tronic twin-clutch automatic, except the most powerful petrol, which was auto-only. Later on, the weaker diesel was also made available with four-wheel drive, and later still, a new entry-level petrol version was introduced, using a 150hp turbocharged 1.4 and front-wheel drive. A high-performance RS Q3 was also available.
  • At first, just two trim levels were available. The SE (later replaced by Sport trim) was the entry-point to the range, and even that one was reasonably well equipped, coming with standard kit including alloy wheels, dual-zone climate control, automatic lights and wipers, rear parking sensors, aluminium roof rails and an audio system with 6.5-inch colour screen, Bluetooth and iPod connection. The S line trim mainly added styling upgrades, including bigger alloys, a body kit, xenon headlamps with LED daytime running lights and LED tail lights. Later, an S line Plus trim was introduced (later replaced by the Black Edition), which added even bigger wheels, rear privacy glass, metallic paint, cruise control and satnav.
  • At the beginning of 2015, the Q3 underwent a reasonably significant facelift. The looks were sharpened up thanks to a new 3D-effect grille, redesigned bumpers, new alloy wheel designs and rework LED tail lights. The two S line trims also got ‘scrolling’ indicators, which imply a direction change by sequentially illuminating a line of LEDs in a cool swooshing motion. The engine range underwent a range of revisions, too, with most of them receiving small hikes in power, along with improved efficiency figures.

  • If you're on a budget: No Q3 is going to come cheap, but there’s very little wrong with the entry-level 1.4 TFSI version. It feels impressively punchy and eager, especially for an engine with such a modest capacity, and it’s also really quiet and smooth, keeping life civilised.
  • If economy is your priority: You’ll be best off with the entry-level diesel, which had 138bhp before the 2015 facelift and 148bhp after it. The engine is available with front-wheel drive or four-wheel drive, and with a manual or twin-clutch automatic gearbox, but in both cases, choose the first option for maximum efficiency.
  • If you’re after something with a bit more pace: You could opt for one of the 2.0-litre petrols, but as these are rather thirsty, we reckon the more powerful diesel would be a better bet for more drivers. With 175bhp or 181bhp depending on the age of the car, it provides a very useful slice of extra acceleration over its weaker relation.
  • If you want the fastest Q3 you can get your hands on: Then you’ll be wanting one of the RS Q3 versions. These have the same (albeit slightly less powerful) 2.5-litre five-cylinder petrol engine as the TT RS. It had 335bhp in standard trim, while the RS Q3 Performance cranked the output up to 362bhp.
Ivan Aistrop
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Ivan Aistrop
Ivan Aistrop is a Contributing Editor at CarGurus UK. Ivan has been at the sharp end of UK motoring journalism since 2004, working mostly for What Car?, Auto Trader and CarGurus, as well as contributing reviews and features for titles including Auto Express and Drivetribe.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door SUV