BMW X3 Review (2004-2010)

3.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Precise handling makes the X3 appeal to keen drivers

  • Efficient and powerful engines

  • Plenty of luggage space

Cons

  • Cramped rear seats

  • Awful ride, especially with sports suspension

  • Reliability issues with the 2.0-litre diesel engine

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2004-2010 BMW X3 Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

It may have the appearance of an off-roader and enjoy full-time ‘intelligent’ four-wheel drive, but it’s best to think of the X3 as more like a tall estate car. It handles like a regular car – a regular BMW, no less – and most of its engines combine spirited performance with good fuel economy. Other virtues include a big boot, top-class cabin ergonomics, and reasonably high standard equipment levels.

Yet there are several downsides to the X3, too. Its ride quality is rubbish, especially on the bigger wheels and with sports suspension. Access to the cabin through the rear doors isn’t so great. Cabin materials in the pre-facelift models isn’t to BMW’s normally high standards. It’s not cheap to run. And the reliability issues with the 2.0-litre diesel engine makes buying one a gamble.

If you desperately want an X3 then you may not be put off: if you simply want a mid-size SUV, there are better alternatives.

Search for a BMW X3 on CarGurus

What is the BMW X3?

Having proven the commercial worth of a prestige SUV with the X5, in 2003 BMW shrunk the concept a little bit to create the permanent four-wheel drive X3. Launched on the UK market in 2004, the X3 is roughly as high as its big brother and almost as long, but is about 30cm narrower, giving it a clear advantage in supermarket car parks.

Stylistically the family resemblance to the X5 is strong, but initially BMW messed up the premium feel by cursing most versions of the X3 with unpainted black plastic bumpers. It was an expensive car and yet many owners felt that theirs looked like the bargain basement version. BMW was soon shamed into offering body-coloured bumpers on all models.

The first-generation car gave way to the second-generation BMW X3 (codenamed F25) in 2011.

  • Coinciding with the X3’s facelift in 2006, BMW changed the naming protocol for the car. For example, where previously the 3.0-litre diesel was called the X3 30d, post-2006 it became known as the xDrive 30d, highlighting the name of the car’s four-wheel drive technology. The twin-turbo 3.0 diesel is the xDrive 35d (early models wear 3.0sd badging), and the lower-powered 2.0 diesel the xDrive 18d. Petrol-engined X3s have an ‘si’ suffix; xDrive 25si and xDrive 30si.
  • Although the Sport and M Sport versions of the X3 appear very tempting because of their stylistic flourishes and body-hugging sports seats, they’re best avoided if you enjoy a comfortable drive: their larger diameter alloy wheels and sports suspension make the ride quality even harder and harsher than it is with standard suspension and smaller alloys. Even very enthusiastic X3 owners will concede that the dismal ride quality is the car’s Achilles’ heel, although some claim to like it that way.
  • In many respects the xDrive 20d is the best of the X3 bunch: it’s nippy and frugal and refined. On face value we’d recommend you choose it, but unfortunately we have to say you should approach this model with extreme caution. As you will read in our Reliability section, the 20d/xDrive 20d suffers a variety of quite serious and therefore expensive potential problems associated with the engine, not to mention the diesel particulate filter (DPF) issue that afflict many modern diesel engines. If you do want to proceed with a purchase, check the service history thoroughly and invest in a pre-purchase inspection by either a BMW specialist or the AA or RAC.

  • If you want the best economy: With the caveat detailed in point three of our Three Things to Know section, the xDrive 18d 2.0-litre diesel tops the X3 fuel economy chart with a Combined figure of 45.6mpg. It wasn’t launched until April 2009, by which stage the reliability issues with the 2.0-litre engine were widely known and BMW dealers and X3 owners were taking better care of them, which is a positive. If you’d prefer not to take the risk, the more reliable 30d/xDrive 30d gives 35.6mpg.
  • If you enjoy going quickly: The twin-turbo diesel 30sd/xDrive 35d is the performance star of the X3 range, its 281bhp helping to thrust it along to almost 150mph while blitzing the zero to 60mph dash in 6.4 seconds. It’s also in possession of 428lb ft (580Nm) of torque, blessing the car with some truly impressive mid-range performance. Plus it does 33mpg. Make sure you find one with the SE trim package, though: the M Sport version may look good but the ride quality is bone-jarring.
  • If you need to tow a caravan or trailer: Although the 30sd/xDrive 35d has more than enough muscle for hauling duties, it is expensive, so instead look for a 30d/XDrive 30d. With 369lb ft (500Nm) of torque it’s well equipped for towing and boasts a braked towing weight of 2,000kg. Trailer Stability Control was an option on the X3, but as the car is popular with the caravan crowd, it may not be that hard to find an example fitted with it.
  • If you prefer a petrol engine: The in-line six-cylinder 25si/xDrive 25si is just fine, but the far feistier 30si/xDrive 30si is almost as economical and gives a superior driving experience. You’ll pay dearly for road tax, of course – up to £580 a year – and in the real world the 27.4mpg economy figure is more like 20mpg according to owners, but this engine is a punchy performer and extremely refined.
Brett Fraser
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Brett Fraser
A lifelong motoring enthusiast, Brett Fraser began his writing career at Car magazine and has since worked for Performance Car, evo, Octane, 911 & Porsche World, Total MX-5 and others. A serial car buyer, he writes used car reviews and advice articles for CarGurus.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door SUV