MG TF Review (2002-2011)

3.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Fun to drive

  • Affordable to buy and run

  • Cars with a hard-top are practical all year round

Cons

  • Harsh ride

  • Cramped, low-quality cabin

  • Versions with a CVT auto are nothing like as enjoyable to drive

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment

--

Running costs
2002-2011 MG TF Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

The MG TF is good-looking, fun to drive and incredibly good value these days, which makes it a very tempting choice if you’re in the market for a cost-effective two-seater sports car. Don’t be deterred by the fact the company went bust; maintaining one is easy and actually surprisingly affordable, even today.

That said, the TF is flawed; build quality isn’t as good as it could be, the interior is dated and cramped, and there are some reliability issues that, while easily resolved, can still put a crimp on your enjoyment of the car.

So while the TF is worth a look, especially if its styling appeals and your budget is tight, the fact its rivals are even more enjoyable to drive, just as widely available and, usually, not that much more expensive to buy, means they tend to make more sense.

Search for an MG TF on CarGurus

If you want a cheap two-seat sports car, what should you buy? Conventional wisdom says the answer to that question is the Mazda MX-5, or if you’re feeling a little left-field, perhaps the Toyota MR2 is a better alternative . Relatively few people think of the MG TF these days. But maybe they should. After all, this handsome little sports car was once one of Britain’s most popular, but the fall and rise of the MG brand have left the TF somewhat forgotten about. And as a result, prices are on the floor.

Mind you, that’s not to say that choosing a TF over one of its more popular rivals is an entirely rational choice. When it was born in 1995, then named the MGF, journalists rated its peppy engine, comfortable ride and smart interior, but didn’t find it as engaging as the competition to drive, and bemoaned its lack of space and high driving position.

Its rebirth as the TF in 2002 cured some of these ills, but not all of them; the handling was much better, resulting in a genuinely fun mid-engined sports car, though the interior still felt tight, and a little dated, too.

Nevertheless, even sharper styling, a range of bright colours and competitive prices meant the TF had undeniable appeal, and many of them found homes with British buyers. Sadly, this success was short-lived, because in 2005 the TF’s manufacturer, MG Rover, went bankrupt, and the Longbridge factory where the TF was made was closed down.

But there was life in the old dog yet, or so thought SAIC, the Chinese company that bought up the business from the administrators. So the TF was reincarnated once again in 2008, this time with even fewer changes, which ran to minor tweaks to the cosmetics and interior, and a mildly breathed-upon engine. Unsurprisingly, the TF by now felt positively ancient up against the competition, so it lasted only a couple more years before it at last reached its final resting place.

So if the TF isn’t quite as good as its rivals, why should you care? Well, when MG went bankrupt, its cars’ values dropped like a stone, and with the passage of time they’ve fallen even further. That means even the best TFs aren’t actually all that pricey, so despite their flaws, they’re terrific value. And as a result, they’re still worth considering if you’re after a bargain-basement two-seater.

  • Although the two cars look similar, there are quite a few differences between the TF and its predecessor, the F. Chief among these is the suspension; the original F used a quirky setup with gas-filled spheres instead of springs and dampers in pursuit of comfort, but this did little for the handling. The TF switched to more conventional suspension system, which sharpened up the handling, but also firmed up the ride – to an intolerable degree, some felt – and the TF also benefitted from a more rigid shell than the F.
  • Only one of these engines was made available when the TF was re-launched in 2008: the lower-powered 1.8-litre, now rebranded N-Series and tweaked to meet more modern emissions regulations and detuned slightly to 133bhp. The revitalised range was spearheaded by a limited-edition run of 500 cars, badged LE500, with leather seats and a hard-top as standard, and these command a premium over earlier TFs, as well as standard versions of the later cars.
  • The MG TF scored a respectable four out of five stars for adult occupant protection when it was crash tested by Euro NCAP in 2003. Although the cockpit doesn’t feature a dedicated roll bar, its reinforced windscreen was designed to provide a degree of protection in the event of the car ending up upside down.

  • If you want the best buy: We reckon the smart money chooses a tidy example of the pre-2005 TF 135. Sure, it doesn’t quite offer the heady power of the TF 160, but as a result, prices are lower. You get a slightly softer chassis setup, too, which better suits the TF; the more hardcore nature of the 160 feels a little at odds with the cruisey driving position and olde worlde interior.
  • If you must have an automatic: There’s always the TF 120, but we’d strongly advise against opting for this model. For one thing, it’s down on power; for another, the CVT gearbox saps performance even further, and the way it holds the engine revs up high while you’re accelerating is distinctly unsporting and really rather irritating.
  • If fuel costs are a concern: You might want to seek out a TF 115, because this is the most efficient TF of all. Having said that, the gutless engine makes it feel rather dull to drive, which is one compromise you could probably do without in a car that already has its flaws
  • If you simply must have the newest TF of all: Go all-out and get the LE 500. It might be the most expensive, but it’s also the model that’s most likely to hold its value and be worth something to a collector in a few years’ time. Just make sure you’re happy with the fact that you’ll have to pay over the odds compared with an earlier car.
Alex Robbins
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Alex Robbins
Alex used to be the used cars editor for What Car? and Autocar as well as the Daily Telegraph's consumer motoring editor. He covers all manner of new car news and road tests, but specialises in writing about used cars and modern classics. He's owned more than 40 cars, and can usually be found browsing the CarGurus classifieds, planning his next purchase.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Two-door convertible