Renault Clio Review (2013-2018)

Pros

  • Affordable to buy

  • Clean and efficient engines

  • Big boot

Cons

  • Not much fun to drive

  • Interior quality could be better

  • A number of recalls to check for

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2013-2018 Renault Clio Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

Competition in the supermini sector is wide and varied and the Clio isn’t a car that leads the way in any given area. A Ford Fiesta is better to drive, for example, while a Kia Rio comes with a longer warranty and a Honda Jazz has a more practical interior. However, the Renault does have a lot in its favour. Its engines are clean and efficient, it’s attractively styled and a bit more mature than alternatives such as the Fiesta, and its accommodating boot means it’s a sensible option for family use. If you can find one in the right specification, with a good amount of kit and at a sensible price, it’s subsequently a car worth considering. If outright quality, reliability and driving fun are your main criteria, though, you’re best off looking elsewhere.

Search for a Renault Clio on CarGurus

The fourth-generation Renault Clio is a five-door hatchback that competes with a wide array of superminis, including the Ford Fiesta, Hyundai i20, Mazda 2, Skoda Fabia and Vauxhall Corsa.

It’s a competitive sector, make no mistake, with many customers just going for the ever-popular options such as the fine-driving Ford Fiesta and the high-quality Volkswagen Polo. However, the smartly styled Clio is worth considering if you’re after a small hatch, especially if you want something with sensible running costs and chic styling.

While the grown-up Renault isn’t without its foibles, its practical nature, good value, affordable running costs and smart looks make it a sensible choice. Buyers who want driver satisfaction are best advised to look elsewhere, though, while those seeking the utmost in quality should probably consider alternatives from Skoda or Volkswagen.

  • The early 1.2-litre petrol engine isn’t that powerful and accelerates the Clio from 0-62mph in a sluggish 15.4 seconds. It’s hard work on the motorway, too, so best reserved for those with around-town trips in mind. The 0.9-litre TCe turbocharged petrol, which has three cylinders, is much peppier and more flexible. Renault claimed a 0-62mph time of 11.7 seconds. The 1.5-litre dCi diesel is suitably swift, too, dispatching the 0-62mph sprint in 12 seconds flat. Renault would later introduce the more powerful 120 TCe, a turbocharged version of the 1.2, and an uprated diesel model called the 1.5 dCi 110. Some models were also offered with the option of an EDC dual-clutch automatic gearbox.
  • Expression+ was the minimum grade you’d want to aim for in the early line-up, as it came with air-conditioning and alloy wheels. Dynamique MediaNav represented a good step up, though, as it added automatic lights and wipers and a 7.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system with satnav. A wide range of options was available, too, including an upgraded R-Link media system, a panoramic glass roof, climate control, exterior and interior gloss trim packs and a rear parking sensor. A host of personalisation features were also available.
  • The Clio Renaultsport 200 Turbo, which was designed as a rival to cars such as the VW Polo GTI, was made available in April 2013. The five-door hot hatch featured a 197bhp 1.6-litre turbocharged petrol engine, a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, weighed just 1204kg and could sprint from 0-62mph in just 6.7 seconds. It also benefitted from a host of steering, suspension and braking upgrades, as well as high-performance features such as launch control. A 220 Trophy version was available as well but, in any case, the hot Clio wasn’t as sharp or as engaging as either its predecessors or its main rivals, and the lack of a manual transmission put many buyers off.

  • The best all-rounder: Go for the eager 0.9 TCe Clio in one of the higher grades, as the base specifications are often wanting in some areas. At the very least, aim for an Expression+ model with air-conditioning, alloys and front fog lights.
  • For maximum economy: The 1.5-litre diesel variant of the Clio is the one to go for if you want to visit a filling station as infrequently as possible, with the frugal Eco models often offering over 80mpg. If you don’t want or need a diesel, though, go for the 0.9 TCe petrol version of the Clio as it is still economical and clean.
  • The cheapest used buy: You’ll encounter high-mileage 1.5 dCi diesels and sensible-mileage 1.2-litre 16v petrols at the lower end of the used scale. It’s probably best, unless economy is key, to stick with the straightforward petrol engine.
  • For driving fun: Many will jump straight to the high-performance Renaultsport versions of the Clio, if the best handling and acceleration are required, but if you don’t want to spend that much then have a look at the 1.2 TCe 120 GT-Line model. It’s a bit sharper, stiffer and swifter than the conventional Clios, but it was only offered with an EDC transmission.
Lewis Kingston
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Lewis Kingston
Lewis Kingston is an award-winning freelance motoring journalist who has previously held roles at titles such as Autocar, Car magazine, What Car? and Parkers. He writes reviews, features, news and guides, and can often be found trawling the CarGurus classifieds for bargain buys.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door hatchback