Volvo XC90 Review (2002-2014)

4.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Brilliantly packaged seven-seat space

  • Excellent safety equipment

  • A comfortable long-distance cruiser

Cons

  • Not brilliant to drive

  • Relatively expensive to run

  • Even the newest models are getting on a bit now

4/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2002-2014 Volvo XC90 Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

The smart-looking XC90 is by no means a spring chicken but its good build quality, impressive safety rating, comfortable ride and sheer degree of practicality means that there is still lots to like. It won’t be as cheap to run as newer SUVs and it is now quite dated but, in D5 diesel form, at least the fuel bills should prove sensible.

As with any older luxury SUV, however, it’s important to buy one that’s been properly maintained and looked after. And, while it’s not as reliable as some of the Japanese alternatives – such as a Mitsubishi Shogun – it’s definitely a safer bet than a seven-seat Land Rover Discovery.

For buyers who prioritise driving fun over practicality, though, it’s probably better to take a long look at the BMW X5. It’s not as subtle or as reserved as the XC90 but it handles better and is offered with some excellent straight-six diesel engines, which blend impressive punch with decent economy figures.

Search for a Volvo XC90 for sale on CarGurus.

What is the Volvo XC90?

The Volvo XC90, which was unveiled in Detroit in January 2002, is a luxury SUV that rivals cars such as the BMW X5, Land Rover Discovery, Lexus RX and Volkswagen Touareg.

Unlike some of its competitors, however, the XC90 – which was the Swedish company’s first dedicated SUV model – was offered with seven seats. It also sought to tackle many of the issues encountered in other SUVs; for example, it was designed to offer a flat cargo area, composed handling and good fuel economy. It was replaced by the second-generation XC90 in 2015.

  • The first-generation XC90 was a long-running model and available until 2014. During that time it received many upgrades, including more powerful and efficient diesel engines, a 2.5-litre turbo five-cylinder petrol engine, a stout 4.4-litre petrol V8 and revised trim levels. Volvo also facelifted the car for the 2007 model year, and further refined it in late 2011, to keep it feeling fresh and competitive alongside newer rivals.
  • With all of the rear seats down, the Volvo offers an impressive 1,837 litres of storage space. With the second row up, granting seating for five, a still-decent 615 litres of boot space is available. Raise the third row and that figure falls to 249 litres, which is still enough room for a few bags. The design of the Volvo’s boot also means that there’s no boot lip, so you can easily load and unload items and luggage, boosting its already impressive practicality further. The XC90 only has a braked towing weight maximum of 2250kg, however, whereas a Land Rover Discovery can tow up to 3500kg. In any case, double-check the exact specifications against your requirements.
  • A turbocharged 207bhp five-cylinder petrol version of the XC90 was added to the line-up in late 2004. It could be had in conjunction with a manual or automatic gearbox and, despite being more economical, it offered performance that was almost on a par with the straight-six option. In manual form it could accelerate from 0-62mph in 9.5 seconds, while the automatic clocked in at 9.9 seconds, and Volvo claimed an mpg of around 25. A 232bhp 3.2-litre straight-six engine was introduced in 2006, too, as well as a 311bhp 4.4-litre V8. The V8 XC90 could accelerate from 0-62mph in 7.4 seconds, but it would only average around 20mpg.

  • The best all-rounder: Given the XC90’s weight, it’s best to go for the most efficient diesel versions to avoid crippling fuel bills, and preferably one of the more powerful later models. In 2005, for example, the 2.4-litre, five-cylinder diesel’s output rose from 161bhp to 183bhp. More importantly, its torque output also climbed significantly. This made it more flexible and relaxing to drive. All versions are well equipped but do keep an eye out for upgrades such as heated seats.
  • For frugal petrol motoring: No petrol version of the XC90 is particularly efficient but the manual version of the 2.5T is claimed to be capable of averaging 25mpg. The later 3.2-litre XC90 isn’t far behind, though, with a claimed average of 23mpg. It’s a refined option as well, while its naturally aspirated design means it is less complicated and potentially less problematic than the turbocharged alternatives.
  • For the enthusiast: The Volvo’s five- and six-cylinder engines have their charms but the Yamaha-developed 4.4-litre V8 is worth a look if you’re in the market for something niche. The all-aluminium V8 is very elegantly designed and produces a good amount of power, which helps the XC90 accelerate in a much more eager fashion. If you’ve been considering SUVs such as V8 Land Rovers and Range Rovers, this makes for an interesting alternative.
Lewis Kingston
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Lewis Kingston
Lewis Kingston is an award-winning freelance motoring journalist who has previously held roles at titles such as Autocar, Car magazine, What Car? and Parkers. He writes reviews, features, news and guides, and can often be found trawling the CarGurus classifieds for bargain buys.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door SUV