Honda CR-V Review (2017-2023)

3.0

Expert review

Pros

  • The CR-V is a very reliable family SUV

  • Very good fuel economy if you choose the hybrid

  • Practical and roomy cabin

Cons

  • Fiddly infotainment system

  • Seven-seat models have less luggage space

  • Top-spec cars are expensive

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2017-2020 Honda CR-V Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

The Honda CR-V is a comfortable, practical and safe option that is well equipped and good to drive. The availability of hybrid, all-wheel drive and seven-seat versions lend it further appeal, although the usefulness of the seven-seat model is admittedly limited.

Altogether, especially for those who want a straightforward and reliable SUV, it’s not a bad choice by any stretch. However, the family SUV sector is so competitive that issues such as the petrol model’s unremarkable efficiency and emissions, and the archaic infotainment system, make it hard to recommend as a go-to option.

Search for a Honda CR-V on CarGurus

What is the Honda CR-V?

The fifth-generation Honda CR-V is a large SUV that rivals seemingly countless mainstream offerings, including the Ford Kuga, Hyundai Tucson, Volkswagen Tiguan, Kia Sportage, Toyota RAV4 and Skoda Kodiaq.

Overall, the Honda offers a lot that makes it an appealing and sensible choice for those after a practical, safe and relaxing family SUV. It’s not a stand-out option, though, as the competition is so competitive in this sector. A Skoda Kodiaq, for comparison, has a slightly lower starting price, a wider array of refined engines and the option of a dual-clutch automatic, which is more enjoyable to use than the Honda’s CVT. For some buyers, however, the availability of the hybrid option may give the Honda an edge over its rivals.

The fifth-generation model was replaced by an all-new Honda CR-V in 2023

  • The standard 1.5-litre petrol option produces 170bhp, which is enough to accelerate the front-wheel-drive manual CR-V from 0-62mph in 9.3 seconds. It’s a good engine, coupled to a slick manual gearbox, which suits the Honda well. It doesn’t make a huge amount of torque, though, so if you’re regularly carrying more passengers or luggage then you may find it feels a little breathless. A manual all-wheel-drive model is also offered, which takes 9.8 seconds to hit 62mph and is predictably slightly less efficient.
  • If you’re set on a non-hybrid automatic model, it’ll come with a more powerful version of the 1.5-litre petrol engine. It produces 190bhp but it’s only available coupled to a CVT. Because of the transmission, and increased weight and losses of the AWD system, it takes a slower 10 seconds to reach 62mph from a standing start. It can be noisier when worked hard but it is easier to drive, and it feels a little more flexible, so it’s not an option that should be discounted immediately.
  • The more expensive hybrid model blends a naturally aspirated 144bhp 2.0-litre petrol engine with a powerful electric drive motor, and a flexible starter/generator unit, which makes it the quickest of the bunch. It’s a refined, relaxing choice that’s offered in both front- and all-wheel-drive form, and the 2WD model is capable averaging 40.9mpg on the WLTP test cycle and can achieve a 0-62mph time of 8.8 seconds. You can’t get seven seats in the hybrid, though, only five.

  • The best all-rounder: We’d go for a two-wheel-drive manual 1.5 VTEC Turbo model in SE trim. It’s quicker, more efficient and lighter than the all-wheel-drive version, and if you do need to tackle rougher conditions, a set of appropriate tyres should help keep it moving along. SE trim features the Honda Connect infotainment and navigation system with useful Apple CarPlay and Android Auto support, among other upgrades, so it’s worth the premium.
  • For the eco-minded: Opt for the 2.0 i-MMD eCVT Hybrid model, in two-wheel-drive specification, if maximum mpg is the order of the day. The petrol-electric hybrid can average up to a claimed combined 40.9mpg on the WLTP test cycle, while its CO2 emissions are rated as low as 156g/km.
  • If you’re on a budget: The cheapest model in the CR-V range is the 1.5 VTEC Turbo, with a manual transmission and two-wheel drive, in basic S specification. It’s still good to drive, and comes with equipment including single-zone climate and adaptive cruise, so doesn’t feel an entirely budget affair.
  • For the best practicality: The seven-seat petrol options might seem best for maximum practicality but the usability of the third row is limited and their fitment also reduces the luggage capacity, both with the seats up or down. Hybrid versions have a smaller boot, too, so – if you don’t need seven seats – go for a front-wheel-drive, five-seat model if you want the most practical CR-V.
Lewis Kingston
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Lewis Kingston
Lewis Kingston is an award-winning freelance motoring journalist who has previously held roles at titles such as Autocar, Car magazine, What Car? and Parkers. He writes reviews, features, news and guides, and can often be found trawling the CarGurus classifieds for bargain buys.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door SUV