The Volkswagen Golf Mk6 and Volvo V40 were both popular compact family hatchbacks during their production runs in the late 2000s and 2010s. While the Golf offered a blend of practicality, efficiency, and a touch of premium appeal, the V40 aimed to bring Volvo's reputation for safety and upmarket interiors to the premium hatchback class.
This comparison will evaluate how these two models stack up across key areas like interior space and versatility, performance and driving dynamics, standard and available equipment, and overall ownership costs. We'll highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each car to help buyers understand which better suits their needs and budget.
Volkswagen Golf Mk6 vs Volvo V40
Practicality
The Volkswagen Golf Mk6 offers ample interior space for a family hatchback. With generous head and legroom in the front seats and decent accommodations in the rear, it should meet the needs of most families. The standard hatchback provides 350 litres of boot space, expanding to 1,305 litres with the rear seats folded. Estate and Golf Plus models increase luggage room further.
While the Volvo V40 has an upscale interior, rear seat space and the 335-litre boot are merely average for the class. The rear cabin can feel a bit cramped due to the narrow window openings. Up front, there's a decent amount of room, if not quite as much as an Audi A3.
Overall, the Golf's packaging allows it to just about edge out the V40 in terms of outright practicality and versatility. However, the V40's premium cabin ambiance gives it an advantage for those prioritising upmarket feel over maximum cargo capacity.
Driving Impressions
The Golf Mk6 was offered with a wide range of petrol and diesel engines, from frugal turbocharged options to the potent Golf R with 266bhp. Most models provide a well-balanced driving experience with direct steering, confident handling, and a composed ride. The popular GTI hits a sweet spot of performance and agility.
While safe and reassuring on the highway, the V40 lacks the Golf's dynamic verve. The steering and handling feel a bit inert, and the ride quality trails the class leaders. Most buyers will likely gravitate towards the smaller petrol or diesel engines, as the older T5 is quite thirsty.
For everyday driving engagement and fun, the Golf takes a clear lead over the more sedate and unexciting V40. However, the Volvo's softly-sprung suspension makes it a bit more comfortable for motorway cruising.
Technology and Equipment
Lower-spec Golf models look quite plain, but mid-range SE and Match trims add desirable equipment like alloy wheels, cruise control, and upgraded infotainment. The GTI and R get sporty interior accents as well. While the Golf's tech features are fairly dated now, the intuitive controls and available aftermarket upgrades help offset this.
From launch, the V40 was offered in ES, SE/Momentum, and R-Design trims, with the option of a more rugged Cross Country model coming later. A 2016 refresh brought improved equipment levels across the board. The cabin has an upscale look and feel in keeping with Volvo's premium brand positioning.
Both cars cover the basics well, but the V40 has the edge in terms of overall interior ambiance and available luxury features, especially in the higher trim levels. The Golf counters with slightly more modern tech by today's standards.
Running Costs
Fuel economy for the Golf Mk6 is generally excellent, with the BlueMotion diesel models capable of 75mpg with careful driving. Other diesels return 50+mpg, while the petrol turbo engines also sip fuel reasonably.
The V40's diesel D2 model can achieve 60-65mpg, though it feels quite sluggish. The perkier D3 still manages around 55mpg. Petrol versions are thirstier, especially the older T5. Servicing costs are on the higher side compared to mainstream brands.
Overall, the Golf has a clear advantage in terms of fuel efficiency and affordable running costs across the range, and it should make for a cost-effective ownership experience if properly maintained.
Verdict
The Volkswagen Golf Mk6 and Volvo V40 take slightly different approaches to the compact premium hatchback formula. The Golf prioritises practicality, versatility, and affordable running costs while delivering a well-rounded and engaging driving experience. It's perhaps not the most exciting choice, but it's a smart one for those seeking maximum value and usability.
In contrast, the V40 aims to bring Volvo's reputation for safety and upscale cabin design to a smaller, more affordable package. It has a distinct premium ambiance inside and generous levels of equipment. However, it trails the Golf in areas like boot space, performance, and overall driver engagement. It's also likely to be costlier to run.
For most buyers, the Golf's blend of talents makes it the smarter choice. But those willing to sacrifice some practicality and efficiency for a more luxurious interior environment will find the V40 a compelling enough alternative, especially in higher trim levels.