The Skoda Kodiaq and Volkswagen Tiguan are two of the most popular family SUVs on the market, The Kodiaq is now in its second generation and the Tiguan its third iteration. These SUVs share Volkswagen Group DNA but target slightly different segments of the market, with the Kodiaq positioning itself as a larger, more value-focused option whilst the Tiguan aims for a more premium feel in the mid-size SUV category.
The fundamental difference between these two models lies in their approach to family motoring. The Kodiaq offers the flexibility of seven seats and positions itself as the more practical choice for larger families, starting at under £40,000. Meanwhile, the Tiguan focuses on delivering a more refined, five-seat experience with what Volkswagen describes as 'smart conservatism' in its design philosophy. Both vehicles offer similar powertrain options including mild-hybrid petrol engines, diesel variants, and plug-in hybrid systems, making this comparison particularly relevant for buyers weighing up space versus sophistication.
Skoda Kodiaq vs Volkswagen Tiguan
Practicality
These are both big and very practical SUVs, but the Skoda Kodiaq still takes a clear lead in the practicality stakes, offering significantly more versatility for families. Boot space is where the Kodiaq truly excels, with five-seater petrol and diesel models providing up to 910 litres of luggage capacity compared to the Tiguan's 652 litres. Even the Kodiaq's plug-in hybrid variant, with its reduced 745 litres to accommodate the battery system, still offers more space than the Tiguan's PHEV models at 490 litres. The Kodiaq's seven-seater configuration adds another dimension entirely, providing 845 litres with five seats in use, or 340 litres with all seven seats occupied - a flexibility that the five-seat-only Tiguan simply cannot match (if you need a seven-seat VW try the Tayron instead).
Beyond raw numbers, both vehicles demonstrate thoughtful design in their approach to practicality. The Kodiaq's seven-seat model features two extra seats that fold easily and leave a flat load bay, whilst the middle row slides and reclines for passenger comfort. The Tiguan, while smaller, makes excellent use of its available space with a square-shaped, flat-sided boot design and a false floor that conceals substantial additional storage. The Tiguan's rear seats can slide back and forth to prioritise either passenger space or boot capacity, and both vehicles offer 40/20/40 split-folding rear seats, though neither creates a perfectly flat extended load area when folded.
For families prioritising maximum space and seating flexibility, the Kodiaq has a substantial edge. However, the Tiguan's more compact dimensions may actually suit some buyers better, particularly those who value easier parking and manoeuvrability over maximum cargo capacity.
Driving Impressions
As part of the wider VW Group, these two SUVs share many commonalities, including their engines. The Kodiaq's range begins with a 1.5-litre TSI mild-hybrid petrol producing 148bhp, which proves surprisingly flexible in everyday use despite its modest power output, achieving 0-62mph in 9.9 seconds. The Tiguan offers the same 1.5-litre unit in both 128bhp and 148bhp variants, though the less powerful version feels somewhat underwhelming, requiring the engine to work harder than expected for moderate pace. Both vehicles offer 2.0-litre TDI diesel engines with 148bhp, delivering real-world economy of around 46mpg, though this diesel engine can sound rather gruff at low speeds.
The plug-in hybrid systems showcase interesting differences between the two models. The Kodiaq's PHEV combines a 1.5-litre petrol engine with a 25.7kWh battery for 201bhp total output and around 60 miles of real-world electric range, with the advantage of supporting 50kW rapid charging. The Tiguan's eHybrid uses a smaller 19.7kWh battery but offers two power outputs: 201bhp and 268bhp, with an electric range of 60-70 miles. Both systems operate smoothly when switching between electric and petrol power, though the hill hold control in electric mode could be better.
Regarding ride and handling, both vehicles prioritise comfort over sportiness. The Kodiaq feels stable and refined at higher speeds but can experience noticeable thumps from the suspension over road imperfections, particularly on larger 19-inch wheels. The optional adaptive suspension significantly improves comfort when specified. The Tiguan exhibits a firmer edge to its standard suspension, creating a slightly jittery feel at low speeds, though it maintains tight body control and responsive steering. Both vehicles offer adequate rather than engaging driving experiences, with the Kodiaq's steering being particularly light and the Tiguan's being quick but not particularly involving. But, hey, these are family SUVs after all.
Technology and Equipment
Both vehicles embrace modern technology. The Kodiaq features a 13.0-inch infotainment screen paired with a 10.25-inch digital driver's display as standard across the range, whilst the Tiguan offers a 12.9-inch central screen with a 10.25-inch instrument cluster, with an optional 15.0-inch upgrade available. Both systems include wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though the Kodiaq provides wireless charging as standard whilst the Tiguan reserves this for Life trim and above.
The key difference lies in their control philosophy. Skoda has retained physical Smart Dials for climate control functions, which adjust to control different systems when pressed - a thoughtful compromise between digital innovation and usability. Volkswagen has adopted a more minimalist approach, relegating almost all functions to the touchscreen, including basic controls like fan speed adjustment. Whilst the Tiguan's system looks impressive with sharp graphics and quick responses, it can prove distracting to use whilst driving due to the buried menu structure.
Standard equipment levels favour the Kodiaq in terms of value. Entry-level SE Kodiaqs include 18-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, three-zone climate control, keyless go, and heated front seats. The Tiguan's base specification includes 17-inch wheels, climate control, and LED lighting, but requires upgrades to Life trim for features like adaptive cruise control and three-zone climate control. Both vehicles offer comprehensive safety equipment as standard, including autonomous emergency braking, lane keeping assistance, and parking sensors.
For buyers prioritising ease of use and value, the Kodiaq's approach to technology integration has a slight edge, but the VW is hardly poorly equipped either.
Running Costs
Purchase prices reveal a clear distinction between these two models. The Kodiaq starts at under £40,000, positioning it as the more affordable option, though most variants exceed the £40,000 luxury car tax threshold. The Tiguan commands a premium positioning with higher starting prices, meaning more variants are subject to the additional £425 annual surcharge for cars over £40,000. This price difference reflects their market positioning, with the Kodiaq emphasising value whilst the Tiguan targets a more premium segment.
Fuel economy figures are broadly similar across comparable powertrains. The Kodiaq's 1.5-litre petrol achieves around 40mpg in mixed driving, whilst the Tiguan's equivalent engines post official figures of 46.3mpg for the 128bhp version and 45.6mpg for the 148bhp variant. Both diesel engines deliver real-world economy of approximately 46mpg, making them the most cost-effective choice for high-mileage drivers. The plug-in hybrid variants offer similar electric ranges of 60-70 miles.
Insurance costs reflect the price differential, with the Tiguan's higher value resulting in elevated premiums. The Kodiaq's insurance groups start lower, though both vehicles' plug-in hybrid variants attract significantly higher insurance costs due to their complex powertrains and higher values. Service intervals are similar for both models, with annual or 10,000-mile schedules recommended, though condition-based servicing options are available for higher-mileage drivers.
Overall, the Kodiaq offers better value for money, particularly for families who can utilise its additional space and seating capacity, whilst the Tiguan's higher costs reflect its more premium positioning and sophisticated technology.
Verdict
As we've noted, the Kodiaq excels as the practical choice, offering significantly more boot space (up to 910 litres versus 652 litres), the option of seven seats, and better value for money with its sub-£40,000 starting price. Its thoughtful approach to technology, including physical climate controls and comprehensive standard equipment, makes it particularly appealing to families who prioritise usability and space over premium image.
The Tiguan, while more expensive, justifies its premium with a more sophisticated interior feel, advanced technology integration, and what many will consider a more desirable badge. Its 652-litre boot remains generous for a five-seater, and the cabin feels more upmarket, though this comes at the cost of the minimalist touchscreen interface that can prove frustrating in daily use. Both vehicles offer similar powertrain options and adequate rather than engaging driving experiences, making the decision largely about space, value, and brand preference rather than dynamic differences.
For us, the Skoda takes the win here, but we also wouldn't blame you one bit if you prefer the VW. Bottom line is, these are both really good family SUVs.