Volvo EX40 Review (2024-present)

3.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Well-built, plush-feeling interior

  • Great infotainment system

  • Generous equipment levels

Cons

  • Not as practical as some

  • A bit so-so to drive

  • Not cheap

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
Volvo EX40 front

The CarGurus verdict

The Volvo XC40 was always a popular car, and the all-electric version also added its own extra layer of appeal. That doesn’t change now that the car is known as the EX40. The new car still has cool styling inside and out that’ll delight owners, while cabin quality is high and equipment levels are generous. The high-tech Google-developed infotainment will be a highlight for many, too.

Granted, the driving experience is a little so-so, and it’s not as practical as some cars of its type. However, it’s a convincing and compelling all-rounder that many customers will favour simply because of its cool Scandi style and attitude.

Search for a Volvo EX40 on CarGurus

What is the Volvo EX40?

Enjoy being confused? Then you’ve got an awful lot to thank Volvo for. Strap in and pack a lunch, because this is going to take quite a bit of explaining…

So, you may well be familiar with the Volvo XC40, the Swedish firm’s small prestige crossover SUV offering that’s been with us since 2018. In the past, it’s been offered in petrol, diesel, mild hybrid, and plug-in hybrid forms, and a little later on, Volvo introduced an all-electric version. With us so far? Good stuff.

In more recent times, Volvo has expanded its range of electric SUVs with the smaller EX30 and the much larger EX90, and that’s brought with it a new naming convention for such cars in to which the electric version of the XC40, and the electric-only C40 - a kind of coupe-style version of the same car - don’t fit.

So, to keep things consistent, the C40 and the electric versions of the XC40 have been renamed as the EC40 and EX40, respectively. The XC40 name carries on, though, because that’s still used for the mild hybrid versions of the car. Still with us? Well, we wouldn’t blame you if you’re not, frankly.

Whatever the nomenclature, the vehicle is an all-electric SUV that competes with a vast array of rivals. Prestige alternatives include the Audi Q4 E-Tron, the BMW iX1 and Mercedes EQA, plus the electric version of the Mini Countryman and maybe even the Tesla Model Y. There’s also an in-house rival in the shape of the mechanically-very-similar Polestar 2. Meanwhile, less premium marques such as Citroen, Kia and Hyundai also offer electric SUVs of a similar size, but for a lot less cash.

  • Volvo quotes its AC home charging times for an 11kW connection, and these stand at 11 hours for the Single Motor, 12 hours for the Single Motor Extended Range, and 13 hours for the Twin Motor. This is rather misleading, however, because hardly any UK homes have the three-phase electrics needed for a connection of this speed. The vast majority of UK homes have a connection of 7.4kW or thereabouts, in which case charging times are likely to sit at closer to 20 hours for a full 0-100% charge on all three versions.
  • The EX40 is capable of DC rapid charging at speeds of up to 175kW. Regardless of version, Volvo says that a powerful enough public DC charger can deliver a 10-80% top-up in approximately half an hour.
  • Volvo cars have a well-earned reputation for safety, but precisely how safe your EX40 will be depends on which version you go for. Entry-level Core models have plenty of sophisticated preventative and protective safety measures, including autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, and lane departure warning, but Plus and Ultra specs add even more tech, including adaptive cruise control with semi-autonomous driving functionality, blind spot monitoring, and rear cross traffic alert with rear collision warning. The car was crash-tested by Euro NCAP back in 2018 when it was known as the XC40, and it achieved the full five-star rating, not surprising when that’s a feat that’s been achieved by every Volvo tested since 2001.

  • If you want the cheapest one: The Single Motor’s 296-mile range will be plenty for most, and so will its level of performance. Combine it with entry-level Plus trim, you’ll be buying the cheapest version of the EX40, yet you’ll still get a substantial slice of luxury kit.
  • If you want the one with the longest range: That’s the Single Motor Extended Range. With an official WLTP range of 343 miles, it only has an 11-mile advantage over the Twin Motor. However, that’s due to the range-topper’s larger battery, and the Extended Range version uses its power more efficiently, so you’re more likely to get closer to the official figure in the real world.
  • If you want the fastest one: The Twin Motor is the EX40 for you. It has huge levels of power and torque for properly eye-widening acceleration, whether you’re getting away from the mark of picking up speed on the move.
  • If you’re a company car driver: You might as well splurge and have the range-topping Twin Motor in range-topping Ultra trim. Yes, it’s an expensive choice, but company car tax bills are so low on electric cars at the moment - and will be for the next few years - that you won’t save all that much cash by being conservative with your selection.
Ivan Aistrop
Published 21 Jun 2024 by Ivan Aistrop
Ivan Aistrop is a Contributing Editor at CarGurus UK. Ivan has been at the sharp end of UK motoring journalism since 2004, working mostly for What Car?, Auto Trader and CarGurus, as well as contributing reviews and features for titles including Auto Express and Drivetribe.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door compact SUV