Hyundai ix35 Review (2010-2015)

Pros

  • Lots of standard equipment

  • Affordable to buy

  • Excellent safety by the standards of the time

Cons

  • Not as fun to drive as a Skoda Yeti

  • Gruff diesel engines

  • Unsettled ride

3/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2010-2015 Hyundai ix35 Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

The ix35 was something of a breakout car for Hyundai, demonstrating that it could build cars with eye-catching design and high quality that were able to challenge models from mainstream brands. More importantly, it proved that the firm could make desirable cars that consumers wanted to buy for reasons other than a low price or a long warranty.

It’s not perfect. On the road, it couldn’t match the likes of the Ford Kuga or Skoda Yeti, either in terms of ride and handling, or in engine refinement. But it offered a great deal of standard equipment and ended up undercutting comparable variants of rival models. More importantly, it’s robust, practical and comfortable, plus the savings it offered when new have carried over to the used market, making it a savvy buy for those who want a distinctive but hassle-free family SUV.

Search for a Hyundai ix35 on CarGurus

What is the Hyundai ix35?

When the Hyundai ix35 was introduced in 2010, Korean manufacturers were still busy establishing the reputation they now deservedly have for well-built, well-engineered, well-designed cars that don’t cost the earth. In the early noughties, their products had been cheap, but not that cheerful. Interior quality was often poor and, on the road, they couldn’t match European and Japanese competitors.

But Kia’s Ceed starting changing perceptions of what Korean cars were about, and Hyundai’s i10 soon reinforced that. And then, the ix35 came along and showed that these were no flukes.

The ix35 was an intriguing proposition. Aimed at the burgeoning SUV family car market kick-started by the Nissan Qashqai, and with attractive rivals in the shape of the Ford Kuga and Skoda Yeti, the ix35 had stiff competition. Hyundai also thought (correctly, as it turned out) that these new crossovers were also challenging the dominance of small family hatchbacks such as the Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf and Vauxhall Astra.

The ix35’s styling eschewed the boxy design of many SUV-style cars of the era, with Hyundai opting instead for a more sculpted look, with more similarities to a conventional hatchback than a 4x4. The bodywork does contain a lot of detail, which might make it too fussy for some tastes, but it possesses what could be described as rugged good looks.

First revealed in 2009, the ix35 arrived in UK showrooms in 2010 as a replacement for the long-serving Tucson. It was facelifted in 2013, with the exterior getting a very subtle makeover, the model line-up being restructured and the infotainment being improved.

  • The ix35 was awarded five stars for safety by testing organisation Euro NCAP, with impressive scores at the time. For example, the 90% adult occupant score, 88% child occupant score and 71% safety assist were all good at the time. There were frontal-, side body- and side head airbags, as well as seatbelt pretensioners, while four-wheel drive was also an option for cars powered by the 2.0-litre diesel, which is worth checking out when comparing used cars.
  • The ix35 was an example of Hyundai’s short-lived decision to identify some of its cars by a combination of letters and numbers instead of a name. So, the ix35 replaced the Tucson, while the brand’s small MPV was known as the ix20. However, the latter was never replaced directly (its place in the line-up was taken by the Kona, a small SUV), while when the ix35 was pensioned off, its replacement was, erm, the Tucson. Go figure.
  • Perhaps the most interesting ix35 of the lot is the FCV, which stands for Fuel Cell Vehicle. Powered by hydrogen, this hi-tech model used a 134bhp electric motor, could travel 350 miles on a tank, and produced nothing from its tailpipe but water. Unfortunately, a price tag of over £50,00 when new, plus an acute shortage of specialist filling stations, means that it’s a very rare sight.

  • The most economical variant of the ix35 – and, as a result, the most popular with original buyers – is powered by a 1.7-litre CRDi diesel engine. It’s not quick – it takes 12.4 seconds to complete the 0-62mph acceleration test and the top speed is only 108mph – but 53mpg was a pretty decent result at the time.
  • If you want an ix35 with four-wheel drive that can go off-road, then you’ll need the 2.0-litre diesel engine. It slows the car down – 0-62mph took 10.2 seconds, as opposed to 9.4 seconds with two-wheel drive – but it will give you a little more capability if you need to head away from the Tarmac, although it’s better suited to poor weather on the road than serious mud-plugging.
  • A petrol engine is a good option for those drivers who tend not to cover many miles. The ix35's can be a little noisy when driven with any enthusiasm, but the 133bhp 1.6-litre unit is nippy enough in urban driving, with a 0-62mph time of 11.1 seconds. Take it on to more open roads and building up some speed can find the car coming up against its limits earlier than you might expect, so using a more leisurely driving style is the best policy.
Craig Thomas
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Craig Thomas
Craig Thomas is a motoring journalist with over 15 years' experience, writing for magazines, national newspapers, websites and specialist automotive publications. London-based, so EVs are a particular area of interest. And fast estates. Always fast estates.
Ivan Aistrop
Updated 6 Jan 2025 by Ivan Aistrop
Ivan Aistrop is a Contributing Editor at CarGurus UK. Ivan has been at the sharp end of UK motoring journalism since 2004, working mostly for What Car?, Auto Trader and CarGurus, as well as contributing reviews and features for titles including Auto Express and Drivetribe.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door SUV