Fiat Tipo Review (2016-2023)

2.0

Expert review

Pros

  • Reasonably practical cabin

  • Decent boot space

  • Very cheap to buy

Cons

  • Disappointing to drive

  • Hard plastics in the low-rent cabin

  • Poor safety rating, unless fitted with the optional Safety Pack

2/5Overall score
Practicality
Driving
Tech and equipment
Running costs
2016-2020 Fiat Tipo Generational Review summaryImage

The CarGurus verdict

Considered in isolation, the Fiat Tipo isn’t a dreadful car. It’s practical and has some usefully efficient engines. When you take it out of isolation, however, it’s not a class-leader in either of these areas. What's more, it lags further behind the competition when it comes to its road manners, design, build quality, technology, and pretty much everything else.

All in all, it’s safe to say that in a crowded part of the used car market, which is packed with accomplished and desirable cars of the same vintage, there are a number of better alternatives to the Tipo. Having said that, the Tipo does have one more thing going for it. It was very cheap as a new car, and now it's only available as a used car, it has an even bigger price advantage over its rivals. So, if you only want basic transport for as little cash as possible, you could do worse.

Search for a Fiat Tipo on CarGurus

What is the Fiat Tipo?

The Fiat Tipo came along at a time when Italian brand Fiat was trying to makes advances in the market by leveraging its heritage, and was busy dusting down some old model names and repurposing them for the modern era. The 500 is a classic case in point, with the reborn car becoming hugely popular all over again.

The Tipo was another attempt, a name from the 80s that returned in 2016, and Fiat hoped would inject some cheerful nostalgia into its otherwise rather humdrum hatchback offering. It certainly needed something, as the new car was taking on hugely successful family cars such as the Ford Focus, Vauxhall Astra, Volkswagen Golf, Hyundai i30, Kia Ceed, Renault Megane, Seat Leon, Peugeot 308 and Skoda Octavia. As that list shows, the Tipo has some strong competition.

As well as trading on nostalgia, the Fiat met the challenge by offering the Tipo as a low-cost alternative to those rivals. The purchase price when new was substantially lower than those of most of competitor models. What's more, that gap has widened even further now that the Tipo has gone off sale as a new car and is only available as a used car: it had catastrophically poor residual values when new, making it even cheaper on the used market. Running costs are also relatively low, making the Tipo a tempting used-car proposition for buyers for whom financial considerations are paramount.

The design of the Tipo is one area where it looks as if costs have been trimmed. That’s not to say that the model looks cheap – it doesn’t – but there’s a distinct lack of innovation or, dare we say, creativity in a car from a company that has a good track record in this department. There’s no sense of flair about the Tipo, and the overall effect is of a slightly bland, rather anonymous car.

The interior is similarly unremarkable, and most of the materials are unimpressive. The plastics are hard and, while this might be a boon for their durability, every single one of the rivals we’ve mentioned above has a cabin trimmed with higher-quality materials.

One of the Tipo’s biggest plus points is its practicality, with lots of passenger- and boot space in the hatchback, and there's also an even more family-friendly estate version, known as the Tipo Station Wagon.

  • Alongside the standard Tipo hatchback, there’s a model called the Tipo Cross. This gets pseudo-SUV styling, with roof bars and chunky black mouldings around the wheel arches. However, there’s no four-wheel drive option and no real benefits to practicality. It also cost several thousand pounds more when new.
  • The Tipo didn’t do well when it was first crash tested by Euro NCAP, only achieving a three-star score. This isn’t good: most cars of that era achieved four- or five stars, so three is very much a below-par result. It was tested a second time and awarded four stars, thanks to the optional Safety Pack, which includes the kind of active safety technology often fitted as standard to rivals, if only on higher trim levels, such as autonomous emergency braking. If safety is a priority, and you’re buying used, check to see if the car had this optional pack added by the original purchaser.
  • The Station Wagon (estate) variant cost £1,000 more than the equivalent hatchback version from new, later increasing to £1,500, but the price difference in used vehicles will be less than that. In addition to its greater boot capacity, the Station Wagon also has extra practicality in other ways, with the ability to carry loads of up to 1.8m in length, after folding the 60/40 split rear seats. The Station Wagon’s boot is also easier to load than the hatchback, as it doesn’t have the latter’s awkward lip. It’s arguably the better model to go for.

  • If you want to spend as little money as possible: There's plenty to recommend the Tipo. It was very cheap as a new car, and the dreadful residual values it suffered when new mean it's even cheaper as a used car. Compared with rivals of a similar age, mileage and spec, you'll likely pay a good bit less for the Tipo.
  • If you want ultimate practicality: This is probably the Tipo's strongest area, but it still can't match the excellent Skoda Octavia on that score, thanks to the Czech offering's huge passenger space and enormous boot. It's also better to drive than the Fiat, and will still be affordable on the used car market.
  • If you want the most enjoyable car to drive: If you're looking at a used car of a similar vintage to the Tipo, and you want something that's enjoyable to drive, then you want the Ford Focus. The handling is fabulous, but yet the ride is still comfortable.
  • If you want the best all-rounder: Family hatchbacks of this era don't come any better than the Volkswagen Golf. It's comfortable, refined and engaging to drive, practical enough for a small family, and it has cabin quality that feels like a cut-above in the class.
Craig Thomas
Published 8 Sept 2021 by Craig Thomas
Craig Thomas is a motoring journalist with over 15 years' experience, writing for magazines, national newspapers, websites and specialist automotive publications. London-based, so EVs are a particular area of interest. And fast estates. Always fast estates.
Ivan Aistrop
Updated 27 Jan 2025 by Ivan Aistrop
Ivan Aistrop is a Contributing Editor at CarGurus UK. Ivan has been at the sharp end of UK motoring journalism since 2004, working mostly for What Car?, Auto Trader and CarGurus, as well as contributing reviews and features for titles including Auto Express and Drivetribe.

Main rivals

Body styles

  • Five-door hatchback
  • Five-door estate